I'm pretty adaptable and can adjust to any environment.
Nobody has any conscience about adding to the improbabilities of a marvelous tale.
I don't adjust my training for any of my opponents. I don't watch films on my opponents.
To reason logically is so to link one's propositions that each should contain the reason for the one succeeding it, and should itself be demonstrated by the one preceding it. Or at any rate, whatever the order adopted in the construction of one's own exposition, it is to demonstrate judgments by each other.
No, I'm not adopting any children.
I have never given adoration to any body except myself.
Any star can be devoured by human adoration, sparkle by sparkle.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
I'm skeptical of any mission that has advertisers at its centerpiece.
The thing is that any sophistication I have, aesthetically, comes from 'Vogue' and 'Harper's Bazaar.' In the '60s, I never missed an issue, even if I had to steal to get them.
Any affectation whatsoever in dress implies, in my mind, a flaw in the understanding.
Not even a maggot is an it, and to refer to any animal in that manner is an affectation, an ignorant stab at science-speak.
Affliction is a treasure, and scarce any man hath enough of it.
We have no reliable guarantee that the afterlife will be any less exasperating than this one, have we?
I'm not a policymaker, I'm not a pundit. In fact, I don't have any interest in it. It's not on my agenda.
I never feel any aggravation from the public.
Any dog can be aggressive; it's basically the way they're raised.
I defy you to agitate any fellow with a full stomach.
It is odd but agitation or contest of any kind gives a rebound to my spirits and sets me up for a time.
I do not have any political commitments anymore. I'm politically a total agnostic; I'm one of the few writers in Italy who refuses to be identified with a specific political party.