The United States military is probably the most socialistic institution in the United States.
U.S. power flows from our unmatched military might, yes. But in a deeper way, it's a product of the dominance of the U.S. economy.
I'm not going to risk our precious military resources on an ineffective, unproductive mission.
The proportion between the velocity with which men or animals move, and the weights they carry, is a matter of considerable importance, particularly in military affairs.
Moving into an unoccupied village when there's no opposition, I don't call that a military victory.
In the midst of the war against ISIS, we have also waged war on corruption in civil and military institutions.
Like so many women, especially military women, I waited to have children.
What we have to stop and think about is that we have weakened ourselves militarily to such an extent that it affects all of our military policies.
Congress votes for things the military doesn't want, and planes and other weaponry that cost a lot but don't work.
I was driven when I was younger. Driven at West Point where it was much more competitive in that women were competing with men on many levels, and I was driven in the military and at Harvard, both competitive environments.
Our concept is not that America should operate alone or by itself in world affairs or in military affairs.
When Arab apologists wring their hands over an Israeli military incursion, they never mention what the Israelis are reacting to, or else diminish and distort it.