We don't have sources who are dissidents on other sources. Should they come forward, that would be a tricky situation for us. But we're presumably acting in such a way that people feel morally compelled to continue our mission, not to screw it up.
In the history of Wikileaks, nobody has claimed that the material being put out is not authentic.
WikiLeaks is designed to make capitalism more free and ethical.
Journalism should be more like science. As far as possible, facts should be verifiable. If journalists want long-term credibility for their profession, they have to go in that direction. Have more respect for readers.
Well, I mean, the real attack on truth is tabloid journalism in the United States.
You can either be informed and your own rulers, or you can be ignorant and have someone else, who is not ignorant, rule over you.
