There is no such thing as a federal personhood bill.
I oppose the personhood amendment. Years ago I'd said that I'd supported it - it was the wrong idea. Looking at it, talking to people of Colorado, I don't support it.
I have signed the personhood petition. I have taken the petitions to my church and circulating into my church. And I have a legislative record that backs up my support for life.
There's an old saying in politics: You never run the same race twice. Democrats are running the same race three, four, five times. It's an old ploy, and Coloradans see through it.
If China is doing business with a company that ends up putting money back into proliferation activities, then we'll sanction that company and China.
We're thinking of creating a board of experts across the sectors of industry, to identify successful programs and to make recommendations about programs that are working and aren't working.
The president named Obama is probably not going to repeal the bill that's named after him.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership has the potential to reshape America's relationship with the nations of the Pacific Rim, enhance U.S. leadership in this critically important region, and provide a major boost to our economy.
He's a nice guy who will never change the Senate. He is the Senate. Eighteen years in politics, and he's got two cousins who are senators, too. Mark Udall's dad even ran for president.
I think Donald Trump has a significant number of issues where he is not a Republican.
Sen. Udall can only talk about one thing: He's a social issues warrior.
Mark Udall wants to run a social issues campaign. He definitely wants to run as the social issues candidate.
I'm not going to speculate about legislation that I haven't seen before.
The Republican Party has to be the party of optimism and giving our children a better starting point. We have to make sure we're broader, more inclusive, and reaching out to every community.
We have a responsibility to be responsible stewards of tax dollars.
I've made sure that I've stood for privacy and the rights of the people time and time again.
I think a 'no' vote is giving the victor, whoever that may be, the win without your participation.